Mostrando entradas con la etiqueta medios de información y comunicación. Mostrar todas las entradas
Mostrando entradas con la etiqueta medios de información y comunicación. Mostrar todas las entradas

junio 15, 2026

RR. SS. ➡️ Comienzos del pódcast diario en la prensa local o de proximidad

Los primeros proyectos de pódcast en la prensa local de España están sirviendo para calibrar su complejidad técnica y su nivel de contenido.

🧑‍🔧 La inversión necesaria no se cubre con publicidad y patrocinio.

📻📰 Tampoco pueden sostenerse como una lectura de titulares.


Aunque se reconoce el interés potencial de los pódcast, falta voluntad en directivos y accionistas de los medios.

ℹ️ Se considera que el pionero en despertar el interés generalizado por el pódcast de prensa fue The New York Times (@nytimes), en 2017, con su «The Daily» («El diario»).



Referencia

🔭📄 El fenómeno de los pódcast diarios en la prensa española de proximidad.

🎓 En RAE-IC. Revista de la Asociación Española de Investigación de la Comunicación (Universidad de Santiago de Compostela, #USC: @novos_medios), María Rosario Onieva Mallero (@Charo_Onieva).

https://www.revistaeic.eu/index.php/raeic/article/view/623




Tabla en página 11 del artículo citado. Elaboración de la autora.


Tabla en página 15 del artículo citado. Elaboración de la autora.


Tabla en página 16 del artículo citado. Elaboración de la autora.


Imagen referencial. Tomada de la web de Acústica integral.



mayo 08, 2026

RR. SS. ➡️ El algoritmo dirige hacia «allí», muestra «esto» o «lo otro», ¿y nosotros? ¿Vamos hacia «allí»? ¿Aceptamos y/o nos conformamos con «esto» o «lo otro»?

Los #algoritmos pueden persuadir, coaccionar, castigar o premiar.

Los #usuarios pueden enfrentar, domesticar o apropiarse de los medios y sus algoritmos.

Y es que tan importante como responder a la pregunta sobre qué nos hacen los algoritmos, es explorar qué hacemos nosotros.



Referencia

📄 Cuando los algoritmos son editores. Cómo las redes sociales, la IA y la desinformación alteran el consumo de noticias.

En Revista Comunicación y Medios, n.º 49 (2024) (@ucatolica), Sebastián Valenzuela (@SebaValenz).

https://comunicacionymedios.uchile.cl/index.php/RCM/article/view/74976

Artículo también disponible en Redalyc (@Redalyc):

https://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?pid=S0719-15292024000100186&script=sci_arttext&tlng=pt



Figura incluida en el trabajo citado.


Imagen referencial. Ilustración en la web Virtuam.



julio 27, 2017

Traficantes de información: ¿la comunicación es un derecho o un negocio? | Fort Apache (@Fort_Apache_), Hispan TV (@Hispantv)



Info: Fort Apache en Facebook





«El derecho a la comunicación entendido como la posibilidad de acceder a una información veraz es un derecho consagrado por la Declaración Universal de los Derechos Humanos. Sin embargo no cabe duda de que los organismos en los que delegamos para mantenernos informados son, en la mayor parte de los casos, empresas privadas que esconden los intereses particulares de los propietarios de los medios. ¿Tienen entonces los ciudadanos garantizado su derecho a la libre información? En Fort Apache analizamos el poder mediático español y sus imbricaciones con el poder político y el empresarial.»






Medios de comunicación en la sociedad digital: ¿hacia dónde vamos? | EAE Business School (@EAE_B_School). Webconference



Info: EAE Business School





«Que Internet ha cambiado prácticamente todas las industrias lo sabemos todos. Que los medios de comunicación son uno de los sectores que, todavía, no ha dado con la tecla del éxito en su camino hacia la digitalización, seguramente también. Existen medios de comunicación digitales de merecido éxito tanto editorial como en número de lectores, pero todavía no parecen ser sostenibles desde el punto de vista del negocio. En los últimos años hemos asistido a un intenso debate sobre la digitalización de los medios de comunicación, muchas veces centrado en su modelo de negocio pero también en qué es un medio digital: ¿debe ser una réplica adaptada a Internet de un medio tradicional? ¿Debemos repensar cómo se consume la información en Internet y adaptarnos a ello? La sensación es que todos coincidimos en que la digitalización de los medios de comunicación es inevitable y necesaria, pero no termina de quedar claro el cómo hacerlo.»






julio 26, 2017

Reuters Institute Digital News Report 2017 | Reuters Institute (@risj_oxford), edited by Nic Newman with Richard Fletcher, Antonis Kalogeropoulos, David A. L. Levy, and Rasmus Kleis Nielsen



Info: Reuters Institute

Document (pdf).





Foreword


»Dr David A. L. Levy
Director, Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism (RISJ)


»This is our sixth annual report that explores the changing environment around news across countries. The report is based on a survey of more than 70,000 people in 36 markets, along with additional qualitative research, which together make it the most comprehensive ongoing comparative study of news consumption in the world. A key focus remains in Europe where we have added Slovakia, Croatia, and Romania for the first time – but we have also added four markets in Asia (Taiwan, Hong Kong, Malaysia, and Singapore) along with three additional Latin American countries (Argentina, Chile, and Mexico).

»This year’s report comes against the backdrop of continuing concerns about how to fund journalism and the relations between news organisations and platforms, but also an intensification in news about the news, driven by attacks on the US media and widespread concern about ‘fake news’. We look at issues of truth and falsehood and trust in this year’s report, where we continue to see big differences between countries and regions.

»We have data on many of these problems, but in particular we have focused on two areas: (1) the extent to which people are prepared to pay for news or the different ways journalism might be funded in the future, and (2) understanding more about some of the drivers of low, and in some cases declining, trust in the media. For the first time we’ve attempted to measure and visualise relative levels of media polarisation across countries and identify a link between media polarisation and trust. Another focus has been on the media’s relationship with platforms – in particular how news is discovered and consumed within distributed environments such as social media, search, and online aggregators.

»We have undertaken a tracking study in the UK to understand how content flows between these platforms and news brands – and to try to quantify the level of brand attribution that results. On the business issues, we have conducted a series of focus groups this year in four countries (United States, the United Kingdom, Finland, and Spain) where we talked to both those who pay for news and those who do not, as well as exploring consumer attitudes to emerging funding models such as micropayment, donations, native advertising, sponsored content, and e-commerce. We reference this additional research throughout the report, but in order to do it justice we’ll be publishing much fuller accounts in the coming months.

»For an industry perspective we’re delighted to include a viewpoint on journalism’s current dilemmas from Melissa Bell, co-founder of Vox Media. Vox has been at the sharp end of explaining the dramatic political events around the rise of Donald Trump. It is also actively exploring new business models.

»In terms of partnerships we continue to deepen our relationships across the world with a multiplicity of distinguished academic institutions. These have helped in a variety of different ways, from preparing country profiles to in-depth analysis of the results.

»Many of our partners are also organising events or country reports looking in more detail at national themes – adding wider value to this international project. In the final quarter of 2017 we will be producing an Asia Pacific Regional Report with our partners at the Chinese University of Hong Kong.

»We continue to make efforts to open up the data as much as possible via our website (www.digitalnewsreport.org). This contains slidepacks and charts, along with a licence that encourages reuse, subject to attribution to the Reuters Institute. All of the website charts have a feature which allows them to be used by – or be embedded in – any other website or blog.

»The website also includes an interactive charting feature, which allows anyone to explore and visualise the data by themselves by country and over time. Raw data tables are also available on request along with documentation for reuse.

»We hope that all of this will continue to build into an invaluable resource for academics, media owners, journalists, and those developing policy. A description of the methodology is available on the website along with the complete questionnaire. Making all this possible, we are hugely grateful to our sponsors: Google, the BBC, Ofcom, the Broadcasting Authority of Ireland (BAI), the Media Industry Research Foundation of Finland, the Fritt Ord Foundation in Norway, the Korea Press Foundation, Edelman UK, as well as our academic sponsors at the Hans Bredow Institute, the University of Navarra, the University of Canberra, the Centre d’études sur les médias, Université Laval, Canada and Roskilde University in Denmark.

»We are also grateful to YouGov, our polling company, who did everything possible to accommodate our increasingly complex requirements and helped our research team analyse and contextualise the data.»




SPAIN


»Statistics
Population: 46m
Internet penetration: 77%


»Struggling newspapers face increased competition online from broadcasters and a handful of thriving pure players.

»Publishers are joining forces to create greater commercial scale. Newspaper circulation continued to decline last year by almost 10% with daily copies dipping below 2 million – less than half the number sold just a decade ago. The leading titles, El País (-14%), El Mundo (-18.5%), and ABC (-14%), suffered the sharpest year-onyear declines in newsstand sales,55 and for the first time in almost six decades, no single newspaper sold more than 200,000 daily copies overall, according to OJD, the Spanish Audit Bureau of Circulation.

»El País, El Mundo, and the freesheet 20 minutos continue to be the most popular newspapers online. El País reshaped its newsroom into a more ‘reader-focused’ one, with increased use of analytics to guide the editorial agenda. It releases content online in three day-parts (at 8am, 2pm, and 8pm).

»Urbano Cairo became the CEO and chairman of RCS, the Italian media group that owns El Mundo as well as Marca and Expansión, the leading sport and business papers. In 2016 20 minutos redesigned its print editions, which attract a weekday circulation of 300,000 in Madrid, Barcelona, Valencia, and Andalusia.

»Pedro García Cuartango was appointed editor of El Mundo after David Jiménez’s one-year stint. Their predecessor, Casimiro García-Abadillo, led the biggest launch of a digital-native news site in Spain in 2016, El Independiente, with a capital of €2.25m.

»Digital-native sites continue to thrive in Spain, and reach a bigger mainstream audience than in most other countries. The most successful are El Confidencial (founded in 2001) and Eldiario.es (2012), and increasingly Público.es, too. The latter was a print daily from 2007 to 2012, before becoming online-only.

»These pure players tend to focus on a few areas where they can excel. El Confidencial has historically concentrated on politics and business, for a more affluent and influential audience than the other natives. But it also diversified early on, with entertainment and technology portals. Eldiario.es specialises in new politics, personal/consumer finance, and culture, but it has now moved into sport, and world news though a partnership agreement with the Guardian. In a move aimed at gaining additional commercial scale, Eldiario.es also bought Vertele, a long-established portal specialising in news about television.

»Público, alongside dedicated subjects such as ‘climate change and animal abuse’ or ‘women, gender and vulnerable groups’, also publishes the viral vertical #Tremending. This mix of ‘tremendous and trending’ content, which combines rumour and humour with surveys and reader reactions, has become popular on many Spanish internet sites.

»Most online news sites in Spain are still dependent on advertising with few publishers operating paywalls, though newspapers get some online income from selling e-editions from digital newsstands. Membership schemes are on the rise.

»Eldiario.es reached 20,000 voluntary paying members in December 2016 and is developing a platform that allows readers to fund specific stories or areas of coverage. Hipertextual, a site founded in 2005 and focusing on technology and science, and the leading site in Catalan language, NacióDigital, also launched voluntary membership schemes in 2016.

»Online advertising continues to be the fastest-growing sector of the market (up 14%), but this in no way compensates for the loss of revenue from print. Overall advertising revenues grew 2.9% in 2016, up to €4,207m, according to Media Hotline-Arce Media,57 with television continuing to take more than half the market. Newspaper ad spend fell by 7.1%, with radio remaining stable.

»Daily viewership of television fell for the fourth year in a row, though one in five (20%) now use some form of pay TV – a historic market high. In face of increased competition, broadcasters are developing more and more online content. Prisa Radio (Cadena SER) launched Podium Podcast in June 2016, offering investigative journalism series, entertainment, and fiction.

»The Spanish have been quick to embrace the growth of messaging with WhatsApp now used by around a third (32%) of respondents for news. It has become one of the main ways of participation, especially through short voice recordings for radio, and many sites have added a WhatsApp share button.


»Samuel Negredo, Alfonso Vara, and Avelino Amoedo Centre for Internet Studies and Digital Life, University of Navarra.»






julio 25, 2017

Shaping the Future. Implications of Digital Media for Society. Valuing Personal Data and Rebuilding Trust. End-User Perspectives on Digital Media Survey: Summary Report | World Economic Forum (WEF) (@WEF) in collaboration with comScore (@comScoreEMEA) and McKinsey & Company (@McKinsey)



Info: WEF

Shaping the Future. Implications of Digital Media for Society Project.

Document: (pdf)

Related: Digital Media and Society. Implications in a Hyperconnected Era | World Economic Forum (WEF) (@WEF) in collaboration with Willis Towers Watson (@WTWhr)






Contents


Preface

Introduction

End-user awareness

Comfort with data collection, storage and use

Control of personal data disclosure

Trust and other areas of tension

Willingness to engage in a personal data value exchange

Country profiles

Brazil

China

Egypt

Germany

South Africa

United States

Appendix: Project Contributors

Appendix: Methodological Notes

Appendix: Data Tables




«Preface


»The End-User Perspectives on Digital Media survey – conducted by the World Economic Forum’s System Initiative on Shaping the Future of Information and Entertainment – is an integral part of the Shaping the Future Implications of Digital Media for Society project. Now in its second phase, the project focuses on improving end-user digital media literacy and on investigating the state of trust between end users and industry, to foster the sustainable development of a robust digital platform and services economy.

»Phase 1 of the project explored the evolution of digital media usage in a hyperconnected world, as well as implications for users’ private, professional and public lives. That work highlighted a need for more in-depth research on two aspects of digital media use: the need for increased enduser awareness of the implications surrounding their digital footprints generated by online activity; and increasing tensions around trust between industry and the end user, requiring solutions for all stakeholders.

»Thus, Phase 2 of the project focuses on valuing personal data and rebuilding trust. For Phase 2, the World Economic Forum, in partnership with comScore and McKinsey & Company, has performed a worldwide online survey to explore and quantify the enduser perspective on digital media platforms, services, and products, and the collection, storage, and use of personal data by companies. This survey covers six countries with more than 6,000 respondents across a range of age groups. Brazil, China, Egypt, Germany, South Africa, and the United States each contributed a population sample of about 1,000 participants.

»In addition, the Shaping the Future Implications of Digital Media for Society project hosted two workshop-style meetings to convene experts from industry, government, civil society and academia to examine and discuss preliminary survey results.

»The first, held in New York City, USA, on 31 October 2016, explored collaborative approaches to lift end-user digital media literacy levels. The second, held in Brussels, Belgium, on 28 November 2016, examined the potential repercussions of end-user perceptions on trust in digital media services and platforms.

»In both meetings, participants previewed results from this survey and remarked on disparities between how people answer survey questions and how they behave in the real world, for example response bias can lead some respondents to say they care more about privacy than they actually do.

»These are of importance when interpreting, for example, sentiment around privacy policies. When people express concerns, do these actually translate into a mitigating action, such as cancelling an account? If not, should their viewpoints be discounted, or should they be empowered with better options? The survey did not investigate these important questions – further research could be useful to answer them.

»While recognizing the natural limitations of self-reported perspectives from surveys, we believe there is essential value in understanding the end-user perspective: today’s beliefs, attitudes and emotions could become the wellspring for tomorrow’s willingness to engage with digital platforms, services and products.»






Digital Media and Society. Implications in a Hyperconnected Era | World Economic Forum (WEF) (@WEF) in collaboration with Willis Towers Watson (@WTWhr)



Info: WEF

Shaping the Future. Implications of Digital Media for Society Project.

Document: (pdf)

Related: Shaping the Future. Implications of Digital Media for Society. Valuing Personal Data and Rebuilding Trust. End-User Perspectives on Digital Media Survey: Summary Report | World Economic Forum (WEF) (@WEF) in collaboration with comScore (@comScoreEMEA) and McKinsey & Company (@McKinsey)






«Contents


Executive Summary

Introduction

Methodology

Section 1: User Behaviour, Preferences and Concerns

Section 2: User Engagement

Section 3: Impact of Digital Media on Individuals, Organizations and Society

Benefits and Opportunities

Downsides and Risks

Section 4: Outlook and Call to Action

Project Contributors

Tables

Endnotes




»Preface


»We need only look to our own experience – at home, in public spaces and at work – to see that technological innovation and digitization are fundamentally reshaping our public, private and professional lives. The Fourth Industrial Revolution is upon us, and the Media, Entertainment and Information (MEI) Industries are at the core of this transformation; they provide the digital tools, services, applications and content we engage with, increasingly anytime and anywhere.

»The emerging digital MEI offerings are the main driver to smartphone, tablet and other connected device adoption, as well as to our changing relationship with many other elements of daily life, such as health, consumer products and mobility. Around the world, people now spend more time using laptop computers and smartphones than they do in other daily activities, and our “connected time” is on the rise. This is referred to by the World Economic Forum as hyperconnectivity, and it will continue to affect how we interact with one other, how we learn and work, in ways that are both profound and impactful.

»MEI businesses have greatly benefited from the digital transformation of their industry, but the challenges of content and service congestion and of rapidly evolving end-user needs and preferences cannot be ignored. No individual, enterprise or government can afford to be unaware of the implications that the growing use of digital media, entertainment and information content and services (“digital media”) will have on industry and society.

»MEI enterprises must continue to innovate to keep pace with the emerging media consumer who continually challenges industry business models and offerings. At the same time, we must begin planning for how our increased connection to digital media is and will continue to change the very fabric of our society.

»With this Digital Media and Society report, the World Economic Forum strives to raise general awareness, catalyse further discussion and stimulate action from its readers. Much can be done by decision-makers in both the public and private sectors to foster the positive implications of increased digital media use and to recognize and address its potentially unfavourable impacts.

»However, as much as public-private cooperation can improve the lives of citizens, in the context of hyperconnectivity much of this responsibility lies in the hands of the individual. As such, the report has been designed to speak to all types of readers. Whether the reader is a parent, a senior company executive or a government policy-maker, this study provides facts, figures and supporting evidence to all its claims, and includes tangible recommendations to all stakeholders for action.

»We hope this collective effort by an extensive group of organizations and individuals will stimulate further consideration of, and research into, the implications of everincreasing digital media use in our lives. vThrough action, partnership or further research, the ultimate objectives of the World Economic Forum are to ensure that an increasingly connected lifestyle remains an asset to business, individuals and society rather than a liability, and that all stakeholders benefit from our work and insights


»Sarita Nayyar
Managing Director World Economic Forum USA
»






julio 24, 2017

Valeurs de la presse, ses audiences, sa data | François Mariet. Livre blanc publié par Ipsos (@_Ipsos) et Weborama (@weborama)



Info: Les défis de la presse à l’ère du digital et de la data. Ipsos - Weborama

Livre blanc: Valeurs de la presse, ses audiences, sa data






«SOMMAIRE


1. LES ATOUTS ACTUELS DE LA PRESSE

Des contenus fiables et diversifiés

Une pénétration et une visibilité quasi universelles

Des données d’une richesse exceptionnelle

Un mode de production journalistique à moderniser


2. LES TRANSFORMATIONS DE LA CULTURE MEDIATIQUE

La relation au temps et à la durée

Prépondérance de l’image : la vidéo remplacera-t-elle l’écrit ?

Des tensions inévitables avec les réseaux sociaux


3. PROBLEMES : UN MODELE PUBLICITAIRE SANS CESSE BOUSCULE

Payer pour voir, pour lire ? Les incertitudes du paywall

Publicité invisible : des milliards d’euros de fraude

Adblock, réaction au harcèlement publicitaire

Diversifications à l’essai


4. SOLUTIONS : MESURE DE L’AUDIENCE, INTÉGRATION DE LA DATA

La clé du succès, c’est la mesure

Il n’est d’audience que mesurée

Des solutions publicitaires ?


5. QUELQUES QUESTIONS ET REMARQUES TRANSVERSALES


6. POUR CONCLURE, ET CONTINUER LE DEBAT


7. NOTES




»INTRODUCTION : UN MÉDIA DE L'HYBRIDATION


»Pendant près de cinq siècles, le modèle économique et social de la presse est resté inchangé. Tout comme la place centrale de l’encre et du papier dans son identité. En revanche, elle n’a pas cessé d’intégrer les innovations techniques et sociales de son temps.

»Ses contenus se sont diversifiés avec l’introduction des petites annonces, de la publicité, de l’image, de la photo, de la couleur ; les processus de fabrication et de distribution se sont améliorés, étendant au fil des siècles l’influence et l’importance de ce média dans les foyers et les entreprises. Sans que le modèle économique ne change.

»Depuis un peu plus de 20 ans, sous le coup d’une disruption, la presse assimile le paradigme numérique ; commence alors un long cycle d’hybridation : à la presse "normale", héritage séculaire, s’ajoutent désormais une distribution numérique, puis une conception et une rédaction numériques. La presse même si elle reste déterminée par le papier est ainsi devenue un média hybride et doit assumer cette situation exclusive parmi les médias.

»Hybride, son statut économique et juridique diffère donc radicalement de celui des entreprises dites "pure players" dont le modèle économique dépend surtout du web. Avec le numé- rique, la presse se frotte de plus en plus à des pure players puissants, aux ambitions mondiales, qui maîtrisent tout l’écosystème numérique et échappent souvent aux législations nationales. Notons que les titres de presse pure player se développent mais n’affectent pas (encore ?) l’économie du secteur.

»Dans cet univers changeant des équipements et des comportements, où la concurrence pour l’audience est multiforme et rude, quels sont les défis auxquels la presse est confrontée ? quels sont ses atouts ?

»Devenant multi-supports, ajoutant de plus en plus de numérique au papier, la presse est amenée à distribuer ses contenus sur des supports de plus en plus nombreux, de plus en plus variés ; elle est amenée à suivre une stratégie indifférente aux supports (platform-agnostic). Du coup, son audience s’est éparpillée, s’atomisant parfois. Tout cela en rend l’évaluation délicate et complexe.

»Dans ces conditions, la presse doit mettre à jour ses méthodologies de mesure afin de rendre compte de toutes ses consommations.

»Comment l’importance prise par la data sur le marché publicitaire peutelle affecter positivement la connaissance et la valeur de l’audience de la presse ? Comment les entreprises de presse peuvent-elles tirer profit, tant au plan rédactionnel qu’au plan publicitaire, de leur data ?

»Nous commencerons par analyser les atouts indéniables de la presse aujourd’hui avant de rappeler les transformations de la culture médiatique qui constitue son environnement.

»Ensuite, nous examinerons les conditions dans lesquelles les évolutions de la mesure et de l’exploitation de la data peuvent donner toutes ses chances à ce que nous continuerons d’appeler d’un terme devenu suranné : la presse.



»POUR CONCLURE, ET CONTINUER LE DÉBAT


»La data révolutionne radicalement la connaissance et la compréhension que l’on a de la presse. Elle est encore loin d’avoir achevé la révolution qu’elle promet. Que faire ? D’abord mettre en oeuvre la collecte de toute la data presse possible et que l’entreprise de presse apprenne à (se) conduire par la data (data driven).

»Pendant les travaux, la vente continue ; la presse doit pouvoir effectuer une mesure la plus complète possible de toutes ses supports. Afin qu’elle puisse vendre toute son audience. Ne rien laisser à l’abandon: dégager les moyens de son développement numérique afin d’inventer le média hybride de demain

»La presse peut être considérée comme un ensemble de données. Actuellement, il s’agit de notamment de données lexicales, analysables automatiquement par des outils d’intelligence artificielle pour en dégager des valeurs sémantiques. Valeurs que l’on peut associer à des données de type sociogéographiques, socio- économiques. À terme, la reconnaissance visuelle permettra de prendre également en compte des données issues d’analyses sémiologiques des images (dont les objets dans l’image).

»Les produits de ces analyses peuvent fonder des techniques continuellement mises à jours de ciblage et de personnalisation, plus sûres, plus fines, plus flexibles, mises à la disposition du travail publicitaire comme du travail journalistique (et donc du natif, qui se trouve à leur intersection).

»La data peut donner lieu à des analyses synchroniques et diachroniques (évolution de jour en jour, historiques, comparaisons, etc.).

»La data autorise une connaissance opérationnelle et totalisante, qui mobilise diverses sources : CRM, sites web, applications, abonnements multiples (web, papier, mobiles, PDF, événements, vidéo, petites annonces, newsletters, boutique, etc.). Dorénavant toutes les actions, vente et lecture, convergent en data. L’organisation aussi bien du marketing rédactionnel que de la régie doit gérer la collecte de la data brute, sorte de minerai, son raffinage, la transformer et exploiter une data enrichie. La data est une ressource inépuisable, sans cesse recyclable.

»L’audience que mesurent les enquêtes classiques (ACPM) peut devenir une source de data.

»La data travaillée par l’intelligence artificielle donne à voir l’audience dans toute sa finesse, ses affinités ; elle dé-couvre et montre des liaisons inattendues que l’intuition ignore, une sorte d’inconscient des textes. Elle découvre et révèle des liens, des corrélations (co-occurences) invisibles. Les données de la presse produisent entre elles un effet de réseau, qui s’apparente à la loi de Metcalfe selon laquelle le nombre de liens potentiels est supérieur au nombre d’éléments constitutifs.

»Le travail de la presse consiste à mobiliser toutes ses données afin d’en tirer profit aussi bien pour une monétisation immé- diate que pour une exploitation indirecte (gestion des ressources humaines, analyse de la concurrence, géo-marketing, image de marque, etc.).

»La data renouvelle toute l’architecture du ciblage, du médiaplanning et de la vente d’espace et de temps publicitaires mais aussi des contenus. La data combine toutes les dimensions temporelles : l’anticipation et la prédiction des comportements micro- et macro-économiques, l’histoire et le présent.

»Comme un éditeur de presse (publisher) est désormais plurimédia, la data qu’il peut collecter est également plurimédia, multi-support, texte et vidéo. Elle s’enrichit pour servir des besoins plus complexes grâce des outils d’intelligence artificielle de plus en plus efficaces.

»La data est la valeur de la presse, valeur exceptionnelle, exclusive et encore en jachère. Son avenir.»