«New Education Policy: Filling educational gaps using ICT»

Archana Mehendale
«New Education Policy: Filling educational gaps using ICT»
The Financial Express

«The evolving landscape of digital learning has the potential to change how education is transacted, and how teachers and learners engage and participate in the pedagogical processes.

»The evolving landscape of digital learning has the potential to change how education is transacted, and how teachers and learners engage and participate in the pedagogical processes. Over the years, the design and development of new technological affordances in the form of repositories of open educational resources, games, simulations and online learning platforms has been growing.

»But one of the key challenges has been to integrate it organically within the school curriculum, while empowering teachers to use these affordances as effective pedagogical tools. In the Indian context, large-scale adoption and diffusion of such innovative educational practices can be facilitated only through a conducive policy framework that can inform the manner in which digital learning can be leveraged in schools, with the teacher as a central driver of innovation.

»On the policy front, India is awaiting the release of a draft proposal for a New Education Policy by the ministry of human resource development (MHRD). There is a lot of interest in understanding how the goal of making “India a knowledge superpower by equipping its students with the necessary skills and knowledge, and eliminating the shortage of manpower in science, technology, academics and industry” is intended to be achieved.

»The consultative processes undertaken by the MHRD during 2015 had structured inputs on two new themes—Promotion of information & communication technology (ICT) systems in schools for adult education, and new knowledge, pedagogies and varied approaches for teaching of maths, science and technology in schools to improve learning outcomes. The manner in which the MHRD delivers on these two themes will be of particular interest to the small yet emerging community of educationists in the country. It is expected that the new policy provisions will commit to leveraging technological affordances for enhancing classroom processes, strengthening the role of the teacher, and creating digital pathways of learning.

»The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development adopted by the United Nations in September 2015 acknowledged that there is great scope in accelerating the human progress by eliminating digital gaps, which is only possible by educating the society on the spread of ICT. This will require facilitating exchange of thought at all levels between learners, teachers and the larger ecosystem to build interconnectedness. In the Indian context, the existing inequities in educational opportunities are further exacerbated by a digital divide and there is a need to facilitate connectedness at all levels between learners, teachers and the larger ecosystem. Technologyenabled connected learning has the potential to address geographical and social disparities, but there has to be a policy imperative to ensure these are used with broader goals of equity and social inclusion. The possibility of “working at scale” provided by these tools can also become a key ingredient to foster connectedness.

»While the MHRD continues to work on policy proposals that allow us to reap this potential, it would be useful to take on board the ideas and insights of educationists, researchers and education technology designers working towards demonstrating the efficiency of technologyenabled learning experiences.

»First, we have to reformulate the role of ICT in schools and education as a whole. The current vision for ICT—as reflected in the National Policy on ICT in School Education—is largely limited to provisioning of infrastructure and setting up of ICT labs. While availability of both core and enabling technology infrastructure is a prerequisite, there is a need to focus on curricular resources. We also have to move away from pre-packaged ICT resources meant for passive uptake to providing access to tools and open resources which learners—both teachers and students—can actively engage with for their own learning.

»Second, with respect to teachers, instead of using technology to teacher-proof the curriculum, we have to respect teacher agency and build her “technology, pedagogical and content knowledge” so that technology empowers her by connecting her to curriculum specialists as well as peers. We have to work with teachers and engage them actively in shaping the use of technological tools in classrooms and labs.

»Third, the government should ensure that students and teachers have increased access (before and after school hours) to computer labs backed by pedagogical resources to achieve purposeful integration of ICT in schools. Teachers need more time on the computers to be able to integrate technology in their teaching. The government can think of providing separate access to computers for teachers, requiring that all faculty will have and use computing devices.

»Fourth, we need an integrated system of collaborative knowledge structures which work in tandem with what is being transacted through the structured curriculum. Such structures should be made available to schools in both English and regional languages.

»The much-anticipated New Education Policy can draw from these field-level experiences which show what learning resources can be created, curated and made available with the use of technology, and what is required to be done at the systemic level to make such educational transformation possible.

»The author

»Archana Mehendale is professor, Centre for Education Innovation & Action Research, Tata Institute of Social Sciences. She is co-leading the Research Group of the Connected Learning Initiative (CLIx), an initiative of Tata Trusts, Massachusetts Institute of Technology and TISS.»